The environmental problems facing today's world are so great that there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation. Government and large companies should be responsible for reducing the amount of damage being done to the environment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?





这是一道观点类大作文,聊的是谁应对环境负责的问题。环境保护是个很经典的话题,一般在讨论时无非就是个人、企业和政府分别能做什么,这道题目在审题时需要注意一点,“there is little ordinary people can do to improve the situation.”也是观点的一部分,在同意与否时需要对其进行论证。下面,王珍老师和大家一起来看下具体观点。











Environmental calamities such as global warming and acid rain loom ominously, casting a dark shadow on the future of human existence. some citizens grapple with feelings of insignificance, doubting their individual capacity to bring about change, while others champion the cause for governmental and corporate intervention to mitigate environmental harm. Personally, addressing this environmental exigency necessitates an amalgamation of efforts from not just the government and corporations, but also ordinary individuals.

Undeniably, the mantle of environmental stewardship falls heavily upon the shoulders of governments and corporations. Governments wield a mighty sword of regulation, capable of curtailing practices detrimental to the environmental equilibrium. To illustrate, they can levy punitive taxes on pollution-rich factories, thereby deterring them from further tarnishing our air, water, and soil. Moreover, with their vast reserves of public funds, governments possess the means to mend the wounds inflicted on our ecosystem. As a testament to this, China, each year, dedicates a substantial budget to counteract the scourge of deforestation nationwide. Similarly, corporations, the Goliaths of the business world, have an inherent duty to address environmental concerns. Their social contract mandates them to operate sustainably, a notion underscored by the expectation for chemical plants, for example, to minimize waste through the utilization of recycled materials and the integration of sewage disposal systems.

Yet, the responsibility to defend the environment extends beyond the halls of government and corporate boardrooms to the realm of ordinary citizens. Though the ripple of change created by a single individual might appear minute, when multiplied by the collective power of humanity, it can stir a tidal wave capable of rectifying our environmental woes. To elucidate, if consumers opt for products with minimal packaging, we stand to conserve a mountain of paper and a sea of plastic. Similarly, if commuters favor public transportation over personal vehicles, we could significantly reduce the volume of exhaust fumes tainting our atmosphere, thereby alleviating the greenhouse effect. Inaction, however, would only serve to accelerate the environmental decay we witness with each passing day.

In summary, while the onus of preserving a clean environment predominantly lies with governments and corporations, the notion that individuals are impotent to instigate change is a fallacy. Rather, we should strive for a symphony of efforts, where every stakeholder plays their part, to salvage our environment and thus secure a more hospitable home for humanity.


environmental calamities 环境灾难

feelings of insignificance 无足轻重的感觉

environmental stewardship 环境管理权

wield a mighty sword of regulation 挥舞强大的规范之剑

detrimental to the environmental equilibrium 对环境平衡有害

punitive taxes 惩罚性税收

scourge of deforestation 森林砍伐的祸害

inherent duty 固有职责

social contract 社会契约

ripple of change 改变的涟漪

collective power of humanity 人类的集体力量

alleviate the greenhouse effect 缓解温室效应

environmental decay 环境衰退

onus of preserving 保存的责任

a fallacy 一个谬论

secure a more hospitable home for humanity 为人类确保一个更适宜的家园




地球环境恶化塑料是凶手吗? | 冬季辩题影单


  • 暂无相关文章!