TOC ASIA 25-26 春季资格赛 | PF 辩题揭晓+Sample Case

经过为期一周的投票，2025-2026 春季资格赛公共论坛辩论（Public Forum Debate）辩题今日正式诞生!

它不只是一个话题，更是我们共同投选出的时代思考。赛程轮转，思辩不止！

新一轮的思辩征程即将启程，扎实的调研与清晰的论证仍是核心利器。如何抢先理解辩题，掌握赛场主动？

TOC ASIA 学术总监 Coach Will 将为2026春季资格赛 PF 辩题带来深度解读与论证框架指导，并提供独家【Sample Case】，助你快速拓宽思路，构建有力论点。

春季赛场已就位——现在，就是思维交锋的时刻！

春季PF辩题

TOC ASIA 25-26 SPRING

公共论坛辩论辩题

Public Forum Debate

Resolved: On balance, the cultural shift toward "anti-neijuan" attitudes is more beneficial than harmful.

辩题：权衡来看，社会文化向“反内卷”的转向利大于弊。

Notice

* 本次春季赛最终辩题，经 TOC ASIA 组委会学术团队 与 NHSDLC 联赛学术团队共同研讨，在原有辩题框架下，对措辞进行了局部优化，进一步提升了辩题的平衡性与公平性。

Sample Case

TOC ASIA 25-26 SPRING

25-26 TOC ASIA 春季资格赛即将开启。

跟随 Coach Will 的 Sample Case，

抢先读懂辩题，先发制胜。

公共论坛辩论

Public Forum Debate

Resolved:

On balance, the cultural shift toward "anti-neijuan" attitudes is more beneficial than harmful.

Sample Pro Case

We affirm the topic:On balance, the cultural shift toward "anti-neijuan" attitudes is more beneficial than harmful.

By neijuan, we mean a kind of self-reinforcing competition where people feel forced to keep increasing effort just to avoid falling behind, even when the extra effort produces very little extra value. It is the "arms race" version of achievement: if everyone runs faster, nobody actually gets farther ahead, but everyone gets more exhausted. By anti-neijuan attitudes, we mean a cultural pushback that treats constant overwork and endless comparison as undesirable, and instead promotes sustainable effort, realistic expectations, and success measured by meaningful outcomes rather than visible suffering. The judge should vote for the team that creates the healthiest and most sustainable path to achievement for the greatest number of people, because a society that burns people out cannot stay strong in the long term.

First,anti-neijuan attitudes make performance sustainable by reducing burnout, which is a hidden productivity killer. In a high-pressure environment, people often respond by extending their hours, cutting rest, and always staying "on." That seems like commitment, but it creates predictable consequences: concentration drops, mistakes increase, and motivation becomes fragile. Over time, people do not just get tired; they become cynical, disengaged, and less willing to invest in long-term goals. This is especially true for students and early-career workers, because they are still building habits. If the habit they learn is "work until you crash," they will crash repeatedly. A cultural shift matters because norms shape what people feel they are allowed to do. When "I need rest" is treated as laziness, people hide their limits until they break. When rest and boundaries are treated as normal, people can recover before they fail. The result is not less effort overall. It is effort that lasts longer. The real advantage is consistency: steady learning, steady improvement, steady output. Sustainability is a benefit to individuals, but it also benefits teams and organizations because it reduces turnover, reduces constant retraining, and keeps experienced people in the system rather than pushing them out.

Second,anti-neijuan attitudes improve the quality of effort by shifting incentives from "more work" to "smarter work." Neijuan often rewards signals rather than results. If everyone is judged by who stays latest, who enrolls in the most activities, or who collects the most certificates, then people respond rationally by stacking visible effort. That creates busywork. It creates credential inflation. It creates a world where the goal becomes looking competitive, not becoming capable. Anti-neijuan attitudes push back on that logic by questioning whether the extra steps actually matter. That change encourages people to ask better questions: What skill am I building? What outcome am I achieving? Is there a simpler method? Could I learn more effectively with fewer hours but better focus? When the culture values outcomes and learning rather than pure grind, people are more likely to invest in high-quality practice, not just long hours. They are also more likely to adopt efficiency improvements, like better planning, better feedback loops, and better use of tools, because they are no longer trying to prove their worth by suffering. This leads to higher real productivity: fewer wasted tasks, more creativity, more time for reflection, and more willingness to take smart risks instead of copying whatever everyone else is doing. That matters because innovation rarely comes from exhaustion. It comes from clarity, curiosity, and the mental space to think beyond the obvious.

Third,anti-neijuan attitudes reduce toxic comparison and rebuild cooperation, which is a major social benefit that also improves performance. Neijuan turns peers into constant reference points: someone else is always studying more, working more, achieving more. When comparison becomes the main motivator, relationships become strategic and tense. People hoard information, hide weaknesses, and compete even when cooperation would produce better outcomes for everyone. This is especially harmful in learning environments, where people improve faster when they can share methods, ask questions freely, and receive support without shame. Anti-neijuan attitudes weaken the idea that your value is determined by outworking everyone around you. That creates room for healthier competition: people can still aim high, but they do not need to treat others as threats. When cooperation increases, the group gets better results. Stronger peer support reduces dropouts and discouragement. Mentorship becomes more common because helping someone else no longer feels like handing a rival an advantage. Over time, this builds social trust, which is a foundation for stable communities and effective institutions.

Sample Con Case

We negate the topic:Resolved: On balance, the cultural shift toward "anti-neijuan" attitudes is more beneficial than harmful.

Neijuan describes intense competition where people feel pressure to keep investing more time, more effort, and more resources to stay competitive, even when the extra investment does not always translate into better outcomes. Anti-neijuan attitudes are a cultural reaction that can include messages like "stop grinding," "don’t chase meaningless competition," and "step back from the race." The judge should vote for the team that best preserves opportunity and long-term progress for the most people, because cultural norms do not just affect happiness; they shape how societies develop skills, reward effort, and create upward mobility.

First,the biggest danger is that anti-neijuan can easily shift from "healthy boundaries" into "lower standards," especially when it becomes a slogan instead of a careful idea. Many important skills require sustained practice: writing, math, public speaking, coding, music, leadership, and even basic professional reliability. Those skills are not built by occasional bursts of motivation. They are built by consistent effort over time, including doing boring practice when you do not feel like it. A culture that repeatedly frames effort as pointless risks discouraging that discipline. It can create a social environment where trying hard looks embarrassing, where ambition looks naive, and where excellence is treated as "taking the game too seriously." That harms students most, because young people are still forming their identity. If the cultural message becomes "don’t bother," they may underinvest at the exact stage when investment matters most. And unlike a short bad week, cultural shifts can last for years. You cannot easily recover lost skill-building time later. The harm is not just lower test scores or fewer achievements. It is weaker competence, weaker confidence, and fewer real options when it matters.

Second,anti-neijuan attitudes do not solve the underlying driver of neijuan, which is scarcity and high stakes. Competition becomes intense when opportunities are limited and rewards are large. A cultural shift cannot change the number of seats, jobs, promotions, or awards. It can only change how people feel about competing for them. That creates a dangerous mismatch: the system remains competitive, but the cultural message encourages disengagement. In that environment, the people who continue to compete aggressively gain an even larger advantage, while others step back and lose ground. Even worse, competition does not disappear; it changes form. When visible effort is socially discouraged, competition can become more hidden and less merit-based, shifting toward signals like connections, branding, or strategic positioning rather than skill. That can make the overall system feel more unfair because the rules of success become less transparent. In other words, anti-neijuan can reduce the kind of competition that builds capability while leaving the kind of competition that is harder to measure and harder to regulate. If the goal is opportunity for the greatest number, a cultural shift that encourages people to opt out without changing the stakes can backfire.

Third,broad anti-neijuan norms can weaken collective momentum, which matters for economic growth, innovation, and quality of services. Societies improve when people build expertise, take on hard projects, and push through difficult learning curves. That does not require unhealthy overwork, but it does require a cultural respect for effort, mastery, and long-term persistence. When anti-neijuan becomes a dominant cultural vibe, it can stigmatize high performers and treat serious effort as "part of the problem." That stigma discourages leadership and initiative. In workplaces, it can reduce the willingness to take responsibility for challenging tasks. In schools, it can lower the social status of studying or practicing. Over time, that cultural drag can reduce innovation because innovation requires people who are willing to do difficult work that might not pay off immediately. It can also reduce the quality of outcomes in areas that depend on sustained effort, like training, research, engineering, and public-facing professional services. The cost is gradual, but it is real: fewer breakthroughs, slower skill development, and less overall capacity.

春季赛开启前，别忘了还有冬季邀请赛哦！