#01、5.17上午 |独立口语思路解析
第一套
Some students like to review their notes regularly on a daily basis, while others like to review their notes just before the test. Which do you prefer?
有些人喜欢每天抽时间看笔记复习，有些人喜欢临考前再复习，你喜欢哪一个？
观点一：每天复习
理由一：通过间隔重复增强长期记忆
英文回答关键词：spaced repetition / long-term retention / neural connections
理由二：减轻考试周压力，避免通宵复习
英文回答关键词：stress management / avoid cramming / maintain energy levels
观点二：考前复习
理由一：时间利用更高效，聚焦核心考点
英文回答关键词：time-efficient / prioritize key concepts / exam-oriented focus
理由二：短期记忆强化更适合突击测试
英文回答关键词：short-term memory boost / context-dependent recall / adrenaline focus
#02、5.17下午 |独立口语思路解析
第一套
Some people believe that teaching children good manners is entirely the responsibility of families. Others believe that schools should also spend time teaching children good manners and politeness. Which view do you agree with? Use details and examples to explain your opinion.
好的教养和礼貌是完全由家庭负责教会孩子还是学校也有责任？
*本题重复2021年2月家考原题；线下考试较新题目，略难
观点一：家庭负主要责任
理由一：家庭是儿童行为建模的核心场域，父母是孩子的第一模仿对象
英文回答关键词：primary role models / observational learning / behavioral mirroring
理由二：个性化纠正更及时，家庭能针对孩子特质调整教养方式
英文回答关键词：tailored correction / situational coaching / sibling dynamics
观点二：学校需共同承担
理由一：学校是社会化实验室，同龄互动催生真实礼仪需求
英文回答关键词：peer-mediated learning / social reciprocity / conflict resolution
理由二：系统性课程填补家庭盲区，培养公共场合礼仪
英文回答关键词：structured curriculum / civic etiquette / cultural diversity
#03、5.17 | 学术写作思路解析
Dr. Gupta
Today, we will examine what economists call incentives-the motivations that lead people to make certain choices. Cost is a major category of economic incentives. People tend to change their behavior when a particular choice gets more expensive. Let's discuss an example. Some economists argue that a good way to reduce air pollution is for governments to raise the cost (through taxes or other means) of fuel for cars. Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint? Why?
Claire
I believe increasing the fuel tax for cars is a good idea. Cars are a main source of pollution; if the government does this, it could reduce the use of private cars and encourage people to switch to public transportation or other means like cycling. Furthermore, this could significantly decrease air pollution, leading to better public health and a cleaner environment.
Andrew
I disagree with increasing the car fuel tax. l feel that adding taxes for economic reasons feels somewhat like punishing the public, who are not directly responsible for this issue. So, increasing the tax would be meaningless. In other words, the solution should address the source of pollution more directly rather than simply making it more expensive for the general public to use their cars.
立场：
支持Claire，提高车辆燃油费用有利于政府利用收入改善环境问题
逻辑链：
A：政府通过税收等手段提高汽车燃油价格
B：政府就有收入处理已经存在的环境污染问题
C：具体来说，政府能够利用这些收益提升工厂的过滤系统和资助绿色能源创新
D：政府能够系统地处理将来出现的环境污染
【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信：mollywei007】
