今天推送的是7月6日·托福·考题分析.以下思路和范文仅供同学们学习·参考。
整体难度：中等
综合写作回忆
综合是一个半身像是凯撒大帝。
阅读因为创作风格是当时的现实主义风格，因为设计和当时使用的钱币是一样的，尤其是发型，还有发现的地点表明当时的民众为了政治原因考量怕新的大帝觉得不受尊重而仍在了河里
@182期jing..
学术讨论写作
Doctor Diaz
In your opinion, should governments regulate socialmedia platforms, or should social media companies regulate their platforms themselves? Why do you think so?
Andrew:
lbelieve social media companies should regulate themselves. There are plenty of social media platforms on the market, so the competitionis tough. For example, to appeal to parents, a social media platform could publicize that they have stringent regulations for children's use of theplatform.In this way, it could attract more users who care about children's safety.
Claire:
Social media companies should be taking an active role in combating the negative effects, butthat is not really happening. l hear many stories offalse information spreading around, sometime scausing irreparable damage to people's reputations. Therefore, the government should put stricter regulations on the companies, and they should be punished for not following the rules.
审题注意点:
(1)这道题重复了24.9.18日考题。很难！
但是已经加入到 写作冲刺团. 这已经是冲刺团第6次命中原题啦！
这是一个是一个政府类+媒体类的新题。也是一个很紧跟时事的新题了。
比如，大家最熟悉的Tik Tok就在美国受到严格的政府的监管，甚至是排挤了…
除此之外，马克扎博的Facebook之前也因为在美国大选宣传中的影响，受到美国国会的传讯。最近社媒-telegram电报创始人在法国被抓，也正是因为认为他们监管不利的原因….
所以，托福今天是考了一个在美国非常火热的话题了：随着社交媒体在全球范围的影响越来越大，到底谁应该来监管。
但是，对这个话题比较陌生的中国同学，可能看到这个题目可能都要心头一紧了。
这个时候一定要沉着冷静。不要想复杂了，不要涉及政治/宗教/族裔等敏感内容, 选择一个自己觉得好写的角度切入。
对于政府来说，可以从监管的有效性来分析。
对于公司来说，可以从公司自身的发展来分析。
(2) 可行的分论点：
政府监管：
--有效地减少犯罪，维护社会稳定。因为盈利性的社交媒体公司，为了赚钱都会最大限度的满足用户的需求，因此往往会纵容用户在媒体上发布一些暴力，色情，甚至是引发冲突的仇恨言论，虚假消息。这样会给整个社会造成不良的影响，甚至是动乱，尤其是还未对社会有全面认识的未成年人。比如，我的一个弟弟就因为看了太多关于世界的负面言论，总是对消极。（government regulation, disinformation, hate speech, public safety）
公司自己监管：
--能够更好地促进自身的发展。如果政府对社会媒体监管，容易管控太严格，限制了媒体的发展。比如，在俄罗斯，政府就要公司严格审查用户发布的内容和话题，导致很多很少人愿意使用社交媒体。公司发展缓慢。而如果公司自己监管，他们就可以蓬勃发展。
--监管更加快速和灵活。因为政府一般当问题很严重到给社会造成了明显的恶劣影响时才会实施监管，发布措施和法令。这就很慢了。而公司自己监管，就可以第一时间对有问题的内容进行审核。（self-regulation, community guidelines, flexibility, immediate action, corporate oversight）
参考范文：
I side with xxx’s perspective that it is better and wiser for the government to supervise social media platforms.Governments prioritize societal well-being and crime prevention, whereas social media companies often focus primarily on profit, striving to maximize user engagement.This commercial drive can lead to theuncheckedspread of harmful content, including violence, pornography, hate speech, and disinformation, as initially seen on major platforms like TikTok, Facebook, and Twitter.Government intervention has proven beneficial, with stringent regulations and legal actions against platforms failing to censor detrimental content,steering social media towards more responsible operations.For instance,my brother joined Twitter at 14, a time when it was rife withextreme and divisive speech. This exposure significantly shaped his worldview, fostering a negative and resentful attitude towards society even though he actually leads a wealthy and easy life.Thus, it is crucial for governments, rather than corporations, to regulate social media to ensure they serve the public good without compromising safety and societal values.（158字）
第2套
整体难度：中等
综合写作回忆
暂缺
学术讨论写作
教授：This week, we'll be discussing the future of education. Let's focus now on the following viewpoint: it is no longer useful to spend many years pursuing a traditional, specialized university degree in a single field, such as communications or economics. Instead, it makes more sense for most people to complete several shorter certification programs and earn certificates in, for example, project management, computer programming, graphic design, and so on.Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint? Why?ClaireI strongly support this approach because it aligns with the changing preferences of many individuals in the modern world who often wish to switch majors or career paths. Embracing certification programs allows people to explore and pursue the fields they are passionate about without the commitment of lengthy degree programs.PaulUniversity education is a superior choice due to its comprehensive and specialized nature. While certification programs offer quick training, universities provide a more in-depth understanding of a subject. They encourage critical thinking, research skills, and a broader knowledge base. University degrees often lead to higher earning potential and career opportunities.
审题注意点:
(1). 这道题重复了25年3月1日的下午场原题。这道题的考题分析老师在公众号里第一时间推送过，看过的老师公众号的同学应该幸运了。
题目翻译：
教授：本周，我们将讨论教育的未来。现在让我们关注以下观点：在单一领域（如传播学或经济学）上花费多年时间追求传统的、专业的大学学位已经不再有用。相反，对于大多数人来说，完成几个较短的认证项目severalshortercertificationprograms并获得证书（例如，项目管理、计算机编程、平面设计等）更有意义。你同意还是不同意这个观点？为什么？
这道题关于项目式学习还是长期专业学习。但是切入点很多，题目也对“学历证书项目”提供了详细的解释。整个难度系数中等。
(1).比较shorter的，拿证书式的certification program学习方式，比如厨师证...：
好处：
1. 时间比较短。方便人们换专业，选择到适合自己的专业= Claire. 尤其是很多工作人士，并没有那么多时间专门学习。
(比如，英国，香港的研究生其实也采用的这种项目制学习，只有一年。所以去学习的很多都是工作人士。)
2. 学费少。时间段，学费也相对低一些，减轻学生的经济负担。
(2).传统很详细很展开去学习一个学位degree的方式.：好处：1. 时间长。学习能够深入系统地学习。否则只能学习一些最基本的内容。比如，可以有更多的学习体验。而如果时间短，大部分只能在教室里听老师授课，为了拿证书填鸭式学习cram for examinations.2. 时间长，学习压力也会小一些。如果时间段，学习压力会很大。（比如，老师在港中文读研的时候，一学年时间虽然段，但其实学习内容跟学习压力跟美国两年制学习是一样的。异常忙碌。 一学期的感觉是“开始了吗？已经结束了”）3. 时间长，能够结识到更多的志同道合的朋友，扩展朋友圈。
参考提纲：
I concur with Andrew's the view that shorter, certification-based learning programsare superior totraditional degree programs. The primary reason is that shorter programs bettersuit the needsof today's professionals, especially given the rapid pace of technological change.
(站队+总观点+分论点)
One major advantage of shorter programs is their flexibility and accessibility.Many people in today's fast-paced society find that their skills quickly become outdated, requiring frequent updates.Take, for instance, the administrative workforce,where many secretaries fear that their roles may be overtaken by advanced Artificial Intelligence technologies that can efficiently manage schedules and draft contracts.In situations like these, going back to college for a full-time degree is often impracticalespecially for those juggling other commitmentssuch as childcare or mortgage payments.
(展开：原因+举例+对比)
Shorter programs offer a practical solution to this dilemma.Even the busiest working mother can find time overa couple of months to attend night classes or afford a brief period without income. These short courses often culminate in a certification exam that can be completed in a weekend,something unthinkable in a traditional educational setting that usually demands at least a year of full-time study.
(展开：对比.)
In conclusion,while traditional degree programs have their merits, shorter, more flexible learning options are better suited to meet the diverse needs of modern society.They offer a practical and efficient route for skill upgrading, making them a sensible choice for today's busy professionals.
第3套
暂缺麻烦有考到不同题目的同学在下方留言更新：政府如何促使人们购买电动车。（命中写作团day18原题）
【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信：mollywei007】
