今天推送的是9月20日·托福·考题分析.以下思路和范文仅供同学们学习·参考。
💪第1套
整体难度：中等
综合写作回忆
一种蝙蝠因为传染病快灭绝了，文章认为前景是乐观的，有三个理由，讲座认为理由不成立。第一点是虽然蝙蝠筑巢下降了，但是寄生虫传染很厉害，一个传一个。第二点是蝙蝠箱，听力认为蝙蝠有很多群，他们有领地意识balabala（没听到）。第三点是喷药还是啥的，听力说有用但是当地政府前几年搞过，人们强烈反对被迫取消了，因为balabala@185期同学 水...
学术讨论写作
Doctor Gupta
In the next few weeks, we'll be talking about urban traffic management. Let's begin by discussing one popular idea--creating car-free central zones. Some cities around the world have recently designated their downtown areas as being automobile-free which means that vehicles are not allowed to enter the city centers.Do you think that more cities should make their central zones car-free？Why and why not?
Claire:
I support the idea of establishing car-free central zones because this will result in one important benefit for city residents-it will be better for their health. Instead of driving everywhere, people will be encouraged to walk or cycle more. It would be a great way to incorporate exercise into people's routines.
Paul:
It sounds like a good idea, but I'm skeptical. My mian concern is that many businesses located in the city centers, such as shops and restaurants, may suffer because th customers will no longer be able to reach those businesses by car. For some customers, if they cann't drive, they won't go at all.
审题注意点:
这道题目重复了7月23的原题。 也命中了【写作团-day18】的推送过思路和范文的原题。 这也是写作团今年第25次命中原题啦！
1."designated their downtown areas as being automobile-free which means that vehicles are not allowed to enter the city centers."
这里指的是，在市中心city centers 建立“禁车区”，其实也就是我们日常说的“步行街”。大家可以联系生活中的现实去分析。
eg. 成都同学都知道太古里-春熙路外围交通有多堵，开车去有多不方便。2. 可行的思路：
好处：
---有助于减少环境污染。因为市中心长时间的交通堵塞，汽车排放的废气会导致空气污染严重。
---方便人们出行。因为车辆多，道路很堵塞，即使自己开车到了市中心，也需要很难找到停车位，对drivers也很不方便。对pedestrian行人来说，也不方便。以前因为有车辆来往，占用很多道路。其次，甚至有的车辆会停到人行道上。行人pedestrian：总是要等很久才能过马路。
---Claire: 有利于人们健康。因为人们只有靠走路，有利于健康。
👩🏻🏫：这算是一个有些“奇特”的角度。大家能想到细节就可以站队。坏处：---影响市中心的商业。因为私家车无法直达，可能会一定程度上减少对市中心的人数。尤其是很多人是去购物。没人想提着大包小包，还要走一段很长一段才能到自己的车上。(Peopleare loaded withbags from stores,only to realizethat they have to walk a considerable distance to reach their parked car. This inconvenience might discourage people from shopping in those areas altogether.)👩🏻🏫：这也是Paul的思路，比较好写，大家可以同意。
参考范文:
参考范文一：Istrongly support this policy of establishing car-free zones in more cities.This is because such a policy canbenefit both pedestrians and drivers. In busy downtown areas, drivers often find them either stuck in a traffic jam or struggling to finda vacant parking spot/place. Meanwhile, pedestrians face challenges from fast-moving traffic and long queues of cars thatblock crosswalks(人行道),making crossing the road impossible while waiting for the traffic lights..By implementing a car-free zone, drivers might be encouraged to utilize public transport or even walk, reducing congestion. Pedestrians can enjoy safer and more relaxedstrolls, enhancing the overall urban experience. This policy, while requiring proper planning, could lead to a more sustainable and pleasant urban environment.
参考思路二：
Itotally applaud this policy of establishing car-free zones in more cities.This is because this policy helps to improve the environment downtown. Without the large number of private cars stuck there, the toxic exhaust they emit will be reduced to a minimum....
第2套
整体难度：低
综合写作回忆
综合写作意思requirement service对学生不好，听力反击@184期 文..
学术讨论写作
题目回忆:有人认为，早年拥有手机有助于孩子保持联系、学会责任感，甚至提高安全性。另一些人则认为这会损害他们的社交发展，分散学习注意力，并使他们接触到不适当的网络内容。你对此有何看法?父母是否应该给12岁以下的孩子配备手机?Some arguethat owning a phone at an early age helps children stay connected, learn responsibility, and even improve safety. Others believe it can harm their social development, distract them from studies, and expose them to inappropriate online content. What is your opinion?
审题注意点:
这道题本身不难; 应该是改编了一道23.8.6日的一道老题目。
This week we covered different parenting stylesOne ideawe discussed was how much independence and freedomwe should give our children, especially young children.One related issue is whether there should be an age limiton when children can have mobile phones.In thisdiscussion post, l would like you to discuss whether youagree or disagree with the idea of setting a minimum agefor when children can have a mobile phone. Explain youropinion. （这道题也是写作团day4的作业练习。所以写作团的同学应该写起来非常轻松）
审题注意点
1.大家可以从：手机的好坏，不同年龄阶段的孩子特质进行分析切入。2. 可行的思路：
同意：
---太小的孩子容易沉溺玩手机。低于12岁的孩子自制力不强，而手机上又有很多好玩的游戏，社交媒体等，容易导致孩子沉溺完手机，影响学习和身体发育运动所需要的时间。
(or--设置用手机的年限有利于孩子的身体健康。By setting an age limit, parents can encourage children to engage in outdoor activities and physical play. 因为孩子就不会一直坐在沙发上盯着手机，而是出去玩。 )
---太小的孩子容易受到手机上负面信息的影响。因为手机上，尤其是社交媒体上，有很多负面的新闻报道，网暴，骚扰的信息，低于12岁的孩子没有分辨能力，容易受到影响，影响他们的身心健康。 （Limiting exposure to social media can protect younger children frombullying and online harassment.）
👩🏻🏫：这些都是比较容易切入的角度，也容易展开。大家可以运用写作团里讲解的，电脑游戏, too much screen time 对孩子的影响思路/语料。不同意：--允许使用手机方便家长和学生交流。
因为很多时候家长需要手机跟孩子沟通。比如会晚一点到校接孩子（running late to pick them up from school.）。而孩子遇到事情了也需要跟家长联系，比如迷路了，比如被人欺负了，生病了。尤其是年龄越小的孩子，越需要跟家长随时保持联系.(This necessity becomes even morepronouncedwith younger children.)
👩🏻🏫：这一点也比较好想到。这也是小学生几乎每人一个“小天才”电话手表的原因。
参考范文:
参考范文一：I believe children under the age of 12 should not be allowed to own a phone.I am concerned that younger children could easily become obsessed with their phones, which would hamper their physical development. Young children, especially those under 12, often lack self-control. When faced with a virtual world full of well-designed games, fashionable idols, and platforms where they can comment on whatever they like, they would be very likely to indulge themselves in it andforgo time they might otherwise spend playing football with friends or constructing a Lego building.It is well known that too little physical activity can lead to weight gain and shortsightedness. For example ... In conclusion...(或者是写作团语料：手机上精心设计的游戏，多样的娱乐信息，能轻易地把孩子们拴在沙发上好几个小时...)
【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信：mollywei007】
