0110月11日雅思大作文题目
Some people think the government should provide funds for performing art training courses, while others believe it is the responsibility of businesses and students’ families. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
话题分类：政府
02题目解读
文字版解读如下：
今天这篇雅思大作文题目是：“有人认为表演艺术培训的经费应由政府提供，也有人觉得应由企业和家庭承担。”
这道题需要先论证双方观点。支持政府资助的人认为，艺术是文化的重要部分，政府出资能保护文化，保障公平机会，并带动经济发展。而反对者认为，政府资源有限，应该优先用于基础设施，企业和家庭更应承担责任，而且市场化培训更高效。
在表达自己的观点时，可以采取平衡立场：政府提供基本支持，社会和家庭共同参与，既确保公平性，也能促进艺术教育的可持续发展。
03、参考范文Introduction：
The question of whether performing arts training should be funded by the government or left to businesses and families remains a subject of ongoing debate. While some argue that public funding is essential for the cultural and social development of a nation, others believe that individuals and private sectors should take primary responsibility for such training.
译文参考：
表演艺术培训是否应由政府资助，还是留给企业和家庭，这个问题仍然是一个持续辩论的话题。虽然一些人认为公共资金对一个国家的文化和社会发展至关重要，但其他人认为个人和私营部门应该对这种培训负主要责任。
Body Paragraph 1On the one hand, government funding for performing arts can bring several benefits. First, it helps preserve and promote national culture, ensuring that traditional art forms do not disappear in a market dominated by commercial entertainment. Second, public support can guarantee equal access to training opportunities, especially for talented students from low-income families who might otherwise be excluded due to financial barriers. Finally, investment in the arts can generate long-term economic benefits by attracting tourists and creating employment in creative industries.
译文参考：
一方面，政府对表演艺术的资金支持可以带来几个好处。首先，它有助于保护和推广民族文化，确保传统艺术形式不会在由商业娱乐主导的市场中消失。其次，公众支持可以保证平等获得培训机会，特别是对于来自低收入家庭的有才华的学生，否则他们可能会因经济障碍而被排除在外。最后，对艺术的投资可以通过吸引游客和在创意产业创造就业机会来产生长期的经济效益。
Body Paragraph 2
On the other hand, relying solely on government funding canplace an unnecessary burden on public finances. Many people argue that resources should insteadbe allocated to more essential areassuch as healthcare and basic education. Moreover, private companies often operate more efficiently and candesign art programs that meet current market needs. Families, too, shouldbear part of the responsibility, as performing arts training is oftena matter of personal interest and choicerather thana public necessity.
译文参考：
另一方面，完全依赖政府资金可能会给公共财政带来不必要的负担。许多人认为，资源应该分配给更基本领域，如医疗保健和基础教育。此外，私营公司通常运营效率更高，能够设计出符合当前市场需求的艺术项目。家庭也应该承担一部分责任，因为表演艺术培训通常是个人的兴趣和选择，而不是公共必需品。
Conclusion
In my view, both sides have valid points, and a balanced approach would be most effective. The government could provide basic support, such as scholarships or cultural infrastructure, while encouraging private sponsorship and family contributions. This collaborative model would promote both fairness and sustainability in arts education.
译文参考：
在我看来，双方都有合理的观点，平衡的方法将是最有效的。政府可以提供基本的支持，如奖学金或文化基础设施，同时鼓励私人赞助和家庭贡献。这种合作模式将在艺术教育中促进公平和可持续性。
【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信：mollywei007】
