昨天纸考的题目，虽然都是新题，但难度都还挺正常的。学了写法，就都非常好写。
先来看下大作文。
题目：
Some people think the government should provide funds for performing art training courses, while others believe it is the responsibility of businesses and students’ families. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
有些人认为政府应该为表演艺术培训课程提供资金，而其他人认为这是企业和学生家庭的责任。讨论两种观点并给出你的看法。
https://www.shawneestatealumni.com/news/ssu-performing-arts-academy-host-open-house-fall-23-registration
解析思路：
这个大作文，是一个非常经典的政府投资类考点。
观点方面，本题本质上，还是问到底是政府负责，还是企业和个人买单。
只不过这次换了个 performing art training 的外壳。
类似的题目，比如政府投资教育education、艺术arts、水资源water、健康health、极限运动dangerous sports等，已经出过很多了。
这些话题用过的观点，比如政府的责任responsibility、而个人负担可以节减轻政府负担什么的，本题依然适用。
此外，题型方面，discuss 题型也很好写，很容易出分。
一般先分别讨论题目两个观点，最后也分析下自己的看法。
比如：intro + view 1 + view 2 + my view。
- View 1：支持政府出资的观点
- View 2：认为应由企业或家庭承担的观点
- My view：表达并解释自己更倾向哪一方（或折中观点）
conclusion，可写可不写。图方便省事，就可以只写四段（题型思路见798 雅思写作 干货技巧 一个视频讲完discuss both views题型）。
intro
开头段就简单改写题目，现说一下自己的看法就可以。
自己的看法，也不必选择了，两个都要（肯定两个都花钱，更容易实现一些）：
The question ofwho should finance performing arts traininghas long been debated. While some believethe government should take full responsibility, others argue thatsuch costs should be borne byprivate sectorsthe private sectorand families.Personally,I believe thatboth sides play essential but different roles insupporting art education.
view 1: government
政府要投资，首先可以谈政府的责任 responsibility。这样可以确保公平。
其次，政府投资有利于文化的传承，因为 performing arts 是文化和特色的重要部分——注意点题。
此外，还可以谈政府也可以从中获益，比如经济方面的好处（带动相关产业发展，产生收入、就业等回报）。
这里观点都好几个了。
不用全写，2个左右就差不多。另一个可以留在 my view 中写。
On the one hand, many argue thatthe government should finance performing arts training. Public funding ensures, as such funding can ensureequal opportunitiesfor all students, particularly those from low-income families, who might otherwise be unable to afford such courses.For instance, government-sponsored programs in countries like France and South Korea provide free or subsidized art classes, enablingBy providing public support, the government helps to remove financial barriersand allowstalented individuals to develop their skills regardless of economic background. Moreover, investing inthe artsperforming arts training coursescontributes tothe preservation and promotion of a nation’s cultural heritage. By supporting art education, governments not only nurture future performers but also enrich society’s cultural life.
view 2: businesses & families
正如前面提到的那样，企业和自己买单，首先可以减轻政府的财政压力reduce government financial burden。
而且个人自己花钱，一般来说肯定是选择自己喜欢的、感兴趣的艺术类型，更有针对性 tailored/targeted。
且更注重效果，毕竟花钱了要看到结果。
写作时，要注意与上一段是转折逻辑。
However,someopponentsargue that the costs of performing arts training should beborne bythe responsibility of theprivate sectorsand individuals.First of all, tThis approach can
reduce the government’s financial burden, allowing public funds to be allocated to more essential areas such as healthcare or compulsory education. In addition,private and family investment tends to bemore targeted and efficient, since people are more willing to invest in courses that genuinely interest them or meet their specific needs.What's moreAs a result, training programs are likely to become moretailored, outcome-oriented, and closely aligned with students’ personal goals.
my view: 两个都要
I think the government should provide support where it is most needed.In my opinion, both governemntal and private investment are necessary.I believe that the government should fund performing arts training for students who lack the financial means, as this ensures that talent is not wasted due to economic constraints. At the same time, programs for those who can afford them should rely on private sectors and families, which encourages more targeted and practical training. In this way, both fairness and effectiveness can be achieved, while the overall system remains sustainable.
【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信：mollywei007】
