2025年10月11日雅思写作8分范文及解析：谁资助艺术家（附2025写作预测题库范文）

双边类大作文，文化类话题

Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

题目来源：2025年10月11日大陆雅思大作文（重复2015年10月31日考题）

1、题目大意

有些人认为政府应该为画家和音乐家等创意艺术家提供财政支持。其他人认为，创意艺术家应该由其他来源资助。讨论这两种观点并给出自己的意见。

2、思路解析

这是一道双边类大作文，聊的是艺术家由谁资助的问题。双边类的题目，需要对每个观点分别表达同意或反对，最终的结论就是我的立场，可以是中立（双方都同意或都反对），也可以是单边支持某一方立场。审题时注意两点，一是题目中讨论对象是“艺术家”而非单纯艺术，因此需要围绕这个群体展开。二是题目中对比双方“政府”和“其他来源”，需要体现双方的特性。下面来一起看下具体观点。

首先来看政府资助的原因，有三方面。

一是政府提供资金支持可以保证艺术家有稳定的创作环境，从而确保艺术的多样性与传承。如果仅靠市场力量，许多有价值但不商业化的艺术形式将难以生存。

二是政府资助能保障艺术的普及。若仅由私人机构或企业出资，艺术家可能会倾向于服务富人或商业利益，而忽视教育和基层文化。

三是艺术对国家形象和经济也有间接贡献。例如，音乐节、艺术展等文化活动会吸引外国游客，从而带动当地经济增长。因此，政府出资可视为一种长期的社会与经济投资。

再来看其他来源资助的原因，可以有两方面。

一是政府资金有限，应优先用于保障社会基本需求，比如教育、医疗、基建等方面，而艺术属于非必需品。如果政府将大量预算投入艺术领域，可能会造成资源分配不公，影响其他紧迫问题的解决，如贫困、住房或公共卫生等。

二是市场化的资金支持能够让艺术家根据社会需求和大众口味创作，使艺术与社会形成更紧密的互动，避免依赖政府资金而导致创作惰性或缺乏创新精神。

3、提纲

2025年10月11日雅思写作8分范文及解析：谁资助艺术家（附2025写作预测题库范文）

4、高分范文示例

Art and culture are essential to society, yet creative artists often struggle to secure the financial support they need to continue their work. This need has led to a debate: some argue that governments should provide funding to painters, musicians and the like, whereas others believe artists should secure financial backing from alternative sources. This essay will discuss both views and explain why I believe that a combination of public and private funding is the most effective approach.

On the one hand, a strong case can be made for government support for the arts. Advocates of this view point out that creative works have significant cultural and educational value to society at large, which the free market alone might not sufficiently nurture. Public funding helps preserve artistic heritage and promotes diversity by supporting projects that may be commercially unviable, thus ensuring that important art forms are not lost simply because they lack mass appeal. Moreover, state investment in galleries, theatres or exhibitions makes the arts more accessible to people of all income levels, fostering a culturally enriched and cohesive society. Thus, many believe that governments have a duty to subsidise artists as a means to safeguard national culture and inspire creative innovation.

On the other hand, many people insist that creative individuals should secure their funding without relying on government support. They argue that taxpayer money is better spent on core public services, and that art, while important, is a luxury that should not strain public finances. Furthermore, proponents of alternative funding claim that when artists depend on private sponsors, charities or the open market, it encourages them to create work that appeals to audiences, thereby making the arts sector more innovative and financially sustainable. They also suggest that independence from state subsidies protects artistic freedom, as it reduces the risk of political influence or censorship in creative work. For these reasons, it is often argued that alternative sources of finance, from corporate sponsorship to community fundraising, are more appropriate for supporting artists.

In conclusion, both government and alternative funding for artists have their merits: public financing preserves cultural heritage, while private support fosters financial viability and artistic independence. I believe that a balanced approach is optimal, with the government providing essential backing to ensure the arts survive and other sources contributing to their growth and diversity.

5、相关词汇和语法结构

creative artists 创意艺术家

financial support 资金支持

alternative sources 替代资金来源

cultural and educational value 文化与教育价值

the free market 自由市场

nurture artistic heritage 培育艺术遗产

commercially unviable 商业上不可行

mass appeal 大众吸引力

make the arts more accessible 让艺术更易接近大众

culturally enriched society 文化丰富的社会

safeguard national culture 保护国家文化