2025年11月1日雅思写作8分范文及解析：种植食物的方式

双边类大作文，科技类话题

Some people think that using scientific techniques is better for growing food, while others think it is better for food to grow naturally. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

题目来源：2025年11月1日大陆雅思大作文

1、题目大意

有些人认为使用科学技术种植食物更好，而另一些人则认为食物自然生长更好。讨论双方观点并给出自己的意见。

2、提纲

2025年11月1日雅思写作8分范文及解析：种植食物的方式（附2025写作预测题库范文）

3、高分范文示例

In recent years, the question of whether to embrace technology or stick to natural methods in agriculture has become a subject of considerable debate. Some people argue that advanced scientific techniques in farming yield better outcomes, whereas others believe that crops should be grown naturally without technological intervention. In my view, while traditional farming has its merits, scientific methods offer a more sustainable and effective solution for food production.

On the one hand, those who favour natural farming methods argue that growing food without scientific intervention is better for both human health and the environment. They contend that organic produce, cultivated without synthetic chemicals or genetic modification, is safer and healthier for consumers. Additionally, traditional agricultural practices are thought to be more environmentally friendly, as they maintain biodiversity and do not contaminate soil and water with artificial inputs such as pesticides and chemical fertilisers. From this perspective, respecting natural growth cycles not only preserves the quality of food but also ensures that farming remains in harmony with the ecosystem.

On the other hand, proponents of scientific agricultural techniques maintain that these innovations are essential for meeting the food demands of the growing global population. They point out that advances such as high-yield crop varieties, genetic engineering, and precision farming can greatly increase crop productivity and reliability. Increased productivity means that more food can be produced using less land and water, which is crucial at a time when arable land is shrinking and climate change is straining resources. Moreover, scientific methods can enhance crop resilience by developing drought-resistant or pest-resistant varieties, thereby reducing the risk of failures and decreasing the need for harmful pesticides. Thus, supporters of high-tech farming assert that embracing science in agriculture is the most reliable way to guarantee food security for future generations.

In conclusion, although natural farming—by eschewing artificial chemicals—offers some health and environmental advantages, modern scientific farming methods provide far greater efficiency and output. For these reasons, I am convinced that applying scientific techniques is the better approach to ensure a stable and sufficient food supply for humanity.

4、思路解析

这是一道双边类大作文，聊的是如何种植食物的问题。双边类的题目，需要对每个观点分别表达同意或反对，最终的结论就是我的立场，可以是中立（双方都同意或都反对），也可以是单边支持某一方立场。审题时注意一点，两种观点中有比较关系“better”，论证时需要体现。

首先来看支持“食物应自然生长”的观点，有两方面。

一方面自然生长的食物更健康安全。自然方式种植的食物往往不使用农药、化肥或基因改造技术，因此能减少化学残留对人体健康的潜在危害。

另一方面自然种植有利于生态平衡和环境保护。而科学种植往往伴随化肥滥用、转基因作物等问题，导致土地和生态破坏。自然耕作啧能使环境长期受益，避免因过度开发而破坏生态循环。

再来看支持“利用科学技术种植食物”的观点，有三个角度。

一是科学技术能提高产量，满足全球人口增长需求。随着全球人口迅速上升，单靠自然农业难以提供足够粮食。现代技术如转基因育种、精准灌溉和高效肥料可显著提升粮食产量，保障粮食供应安全。

二是科学技术可使作物具备更强的抗旱、抗虫和抗病能力，减少干旱、洪水等自然灾害带来的风险。

三是科技农业提升资源使用效率。许多现代科技，比如智能灌溉系统能节约大量水资源，也使得一些以往难以种植的地区也能发展农业。

5、相关词汇和语法结构

The rapid growth of the global population 全球人口的迅速增长

Increasing demand for food 日益增长的粮食需求