观点类大作文,城市规划类话题
Governments should protect culture. Therefore, some people believe that new buildings should be built in traditional styles. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
题目来源:2026年1月24日大陆雅思大作文
1、题目大意
政府应该保护文化。因此一些人认为新建筑应该以传统风格建造。你是否同意?
2、提纲
3、高分范文示例
It is widely acknowledged that the preservation of national heritage is a primary responsibility of any government. Consequently, there is a prevailing sentiment that to safeguard culture effectively, all new constructions must adhere strictly to traditional architectural styles. However, I strongly disagree with this perspective, as I believe that cultural identity is better served by balancing preservation with innovation rather than merely mimicking the past.
The primary reason for opposing the mandatory imposition of traditional styles is the fundamental need for functionality and efficiency in modern urban planning. Traditional architecture was developed in response to the materials, technologies, and lifestyles of previous eras, which are often incompatible with the demands of contemporary society. Forcing modern infrastructure to fit into archaic molds inevitably leads to inefficient use of space and resources, as well as exorbitant construction costs. Therefore, prioritizing aesthetic nostalgia over practical utility ultimately hinders the necessary evolution of city infrastructure to meet current population and environmental challenges.
Furthermore, culture should be viewed as a dynamic, evolving entity rather than a static relic to be frozen in time. Architecture is a profound expression of the zeitgeist, reflecting the technological advancements and artistic sensibilities of the current generation. By legally restricting new buildings to past designs, governments effectively deny the present society the opportunity to contribute its own chapter to architectural history. Thus, true cultural protection implies allowing the current culture to manifest itself through contemporary design, ensuring that heritage remains a living process rather than a museum exhibit.
Admittedly, maintaining visual harmony within specific historic districts is essential for preserving the unique atmosphere and historical continuity of a region. However, applying this as a blanket policy for all new developments is restrictive and counterproductive; a vibrant cityscape should ideally represent a timeline of development, showcasing a diversity of styles that honors the past while embracing the future.
In conclusion, while the government must protect cultural heritage, compelling new buildings to imitate traditional styles is a superficial and impractical solution. It is far more prudent to conserve genuine historical sites while encouraging modern architectural innovation that reflects the spirit of the modern age.
4、思路解析
这是一道观点类大作文,聊的是新建筑是否应该遵循风格。题目理解不难,反对角度会更好写。审题时注意两点,一是题目第一句是背景句,不需要讨论是否同意,但在论证时需要围绕展开。二是题目中主语是gov,因此不要偏题去讨论个人和企业的想法。下面,来看下具体观点。
首先来看反对的角度,有两方面。
一是强制传统风格会阻碍城市发展。现代城市面临更多的人口密集及资源紧张等问题,传统建筑在结构和空间利用率等方面往往难以满足现代需求,居民的生活成本可能会提高。
二是建筑多样性同样是现代文化的一部分。现代城市本身就是多元文化融合的产物,如果所有新建筑都被要求采用传统风格,城市将趋于单一审美,反而削弱了文化的多样性。
同意的角度可以认为传统建筑有助于维系城市历史连续性和文化认同感,居民在日常生活中持续接触本土文化符号,从而强化文化认同感。
5、相关词汇和语法结构
preservation of national heritage保护国家遗产
prevailing sentiment盛行的观点
adhere strictly to严格遵守
mandatory imposition强制性的实施
archaic molds古老陈旧的模具(文中指过时的建筑模式)
exorbitant construction costs极其高昂的建筑成本
aesthetic nostalgia审美的怀旧情怀
practical utility实用价值
static relic僵化的古物
expression of the zeitgeist时代精神的体现
artistic sensibilities审美情趣
manifest itself表现出来
visual harmony视觉上的和谐
historical continuity历史的延续性
blanket policy一刀切的政策
vibrant cityscape充满活力的城市景观
superficial and impractical肤浅且不切实际的
architectural innovation建筑创新
reflect the spirit of ...反映...的精神

