2026年1月31日雅思写作8分范文及解析：无限溺爱的影响（附2026写作预测题库范文）

混合类大作文，教育类话题

Some parents give their children everything that their children ask for or allow them to do whatever they want to do. Is this good for children? What could be consequences for these children when they grow up?

题目来源：2026年1月31日大陆雅思大作文（重复2019年7月27日大陆考题）

1、题目大意

有些父母会满足孩子的一切要求，或者允许他们做任何想做的事。这对孩子有好处吗？这些孩子长大后会有什么后果？

2、提纲

2026年1月31日雅思写作8分范文及解析：无限溺爱的影响（附2026写作预测题库范文）

3、高分范文示例

Some parents express care by granting every request and permitting almost unlimited freedom, believing that constant satisfaction will foster happiness. In reality, this approach is harmful because it replaces guidance with indulgence and turns autonomy into impulsiveness. I argue that such permissiveness weakens self-regulation and moral reciprocity, creating predictable difficulties later in life.

The first reason this parenting style is damaging is that it obstructs the development of self-control. When boundaries are rarely enforced, children do not repeatedly practise delaying gratification, tolerating frustration, or weighing long-term outcomes against immediate comfort, so regulation remains external rather than internal. As a result, effort and patience appear optional, because reward is experienced as something that arrives automatically rather than something that follows restraint. The second reason is that indiscriminate giving distorts a child’s understanding of rights and responsibilities. If personal desires are consistently treated as entitlements, moral reasoning becomes self-referential: other people are valued mainly as providers, not as independent agents with competing needs. In that climate, rules are interpreted as arbitrary interference rather than as shared agreements that make freedom compatible with fairness.

These deficits tend to surface with particular force in adulthood, when success depends on managing limits rather than avoiding them. Adults must negotiate boundaries, accept delayed consequences, and persist through routine setbacks; those who were seldom required to do so may interpret ordinary restrictions as personal affronts and respond with avoidance, resentment, or coercive behaviour. Weak self-regulation can also impair decision-making, producing unstable work habits and difficulty sustaining long-term commitments. Furthermore, entitlement corrodes cooperation, because reciprocity is replaced by demands and accountability is displaced onto institutions, colleagues, or partners. Over time, such patterns can leave individuals formally independent yet psychologically dependent, relying on external rescue rather than internal discipline.

In sum, giving children everything they ask for, or allowing them to do whatever they want, is not a sound approach because it undermines self-discipline and fosters entitlement. A more constructive model combines affection with consistent limits, gradually expanding freedom in proportion to maturity and accountability.

4、思路解析

这是一道混合类大作文，聊的是溺爱孩子影响。题目理解不难，但实际写起来会比较抽象。审题时注意两点，一是题目观点中包含绝对化表达“give …… everything”和“do whatever they want to do”，因此反对角度会更好写。二是题目中既要讨论对children 当下的影响，也要讨论他们未来长大后的影响。

反对的原因可以从三方面展开。

一是会削弱孩子的自控力与延迟满足能力。当孩子的欲望都被即时满足时，会导致他们缺乏等待和克制自己的训练。而没有自控力的孩子在面对当下的学业压力、以及未来工作任务和困境时更容易产生退缩和负面情绪，进而导致他们的完成效率低下以及难以获得成功。

二是会破坏孩子对规则的认知以及“自我为中心”。无条件满足孩子，会让孩子产生错误认知，容易忽略相应的代价和其他人的需求。一旦未来出现无法满足的情况，他们更倾向于将问题归因于外部，而非反思自身责任，进而导致和他人产生矛盾冲突，影响其未来的人际发展。

三是会削弱孩子的抗挫折和调节心理的能力。适度的挫折和拒绝正是培养心理韧性的关键来源，而缺乏这样能力的孩子，一旦目标受阻便可能产生愤怒、焦虑或极端反应。这种情绪不稳定会使他们难以建立良好稳定的人际网络。

5、相关词汇和语法结构