2026年2月7日雅思写作8分范文及解析：提供免费公共交通

交通类大作文，观点类话题

The best way for the government to solve the problem of traffic congestion is to provide free public transport 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

题目来源：2026年2月7日大陆雅思大作文（重复2014年1月9日大陆考题）

1、题目大意

政府解决交通拥堵问题的最佳方式是每周7天、每天24小时提供免费公共交通。你是否同意

2、提纲

2026年2月7日雅思写作8分范文及解析：提供免费公共交通（附2026写作预测题库范文）

3、高分范文示例

Traffic congestion has become a persistent problem in many cities around the world. It is often suggested that the government could tackle this issue most effectively by providing free public transportation around the clock. However, I disagree that implementing 24/7 fare-free public transport is the best way to resolve traffic jams.

Firstly, offering free public transit at all hours carries serious financial and practical drawbacks. Operating a comprehensive transit network is expensive, and if fares are eliminated, the government would have to shoulder the entire cost of maintenance, expansion, and staff salaries using public funds. This could strain state budgets or force authorities to divert money from other vital services, which is neither feasible nor desirable in the long run. In addition, simply abolishing fares does not guarantee a significant change in commuter behavior. Many drivers choose to use their cars for reasons beyond cost - such as comfort, privacy, or door-to-door convenience - meaning they might continue driving even if buses and trains are free.

Secondly, free fares alone do not address the root causes of traffic congestion, and focusing solely on this policy could lead to neglect of more effective solutions. Traffic jams often stem from factors like inadequate infrastructure, urban sprawl, and a culture of car dependency, none of which can be resolved just by removing transit fees. A more effective strategy would be to invest in improving the public transportation system itself - for instance, increasing the coverage and frequency of buses and trains to make them more convenient and reliable than driving. Governments could also implement complementary measures such as congestion pricing, carpool incentives, or better urban planning to directly reduce the number of vehicles on the road.

Admittedly, making public transport free 24/7 could bring certain benefits. Such a policy would likely encourage more people - especially those on tight budgets - to take buses and trains, which could indeed cut down the number of private cars on the road to some extent. Over time, fewer cars would mean less traffic and even lower pollution levels, making the city environment cleaner. Nevertheless, these benefits are limited and come with the financial pitfalls mentioned earlier. If a transit system is not adequately funded, its quality and capacity may stagnate or decline, undermining its usefulness. Therefore, even though a round-the-clock fare-free transit system sounds appealing, it cannot be considered the best solution to urban traffic congestion.

In conclusion, while providing free public transportation at all hours might increase public transit use and offer some relief from traffic jams, I remain unconvinced that it is the optimal way to solve congestion. In my view, a more sustainable solution is to improve the public transport network and implement complementary measures - such as better infrastructure and targeted traffic management policies - to effectively alleviate this persistent issue.

4、思路解析

这是一道观点类大作文，聊的是提供免费公共交通的问题。题目理解不难，审题时需要注意两点，一是题目中有绝对词“the best way”，遇到绝对化表达，持反对角度会更好写。二是主语是“government”，因此讨论时需要从gov角度出发。下面，来一起看下具体观点。

首先来看支持的角度，免费公共交通有助于降低私家车使用量。通勤者会倾向于选择性价比更高的出行方式，从而减少道路上的私家车数量，交通拥堵程度自然随之下降。

反对的角度有两方面。

一方面，交通拥堵的根源不只是出行成本问题。道路容量不足、城市功能布局不合理等都可能导致拥堵，而非单纯的公共交通收费问题。即使公共交通完全免费，如果线路覆盖不足或耗时过长，许多人仍会选择私家车。

另一方面，免费政策会带来财政负担，导致政策难以持续。全天候免费公共交通需要政府长期承担高昂的运营与维护成本，包括人力、能源和基础设施更新。如果财政资源被大量投入到补贴票价上，政府可能无力投资于更关键的措施，如道路扩建、智能交通系统或城市功能分区优化。

5、相关词汇和语法结构