今天推送的是6月14日·托福·考题分析.以下思路和范文仅供同学们学习·参考。
第1套
整体难度：难
综合写作回忆
埃及人航海@180期 he..@171期 nan..
学术讨论写作
Dr. Achebe(抱歉，题目贴错,已更新在下方留言区）On the day of outdoor classes, students will be transported to local parks. There, teachers will help students explore nature and learn about the environment (for example, plants and animals), environmental problems (such as pollution), and ways of addressing these problems. Do you think that outdoor classes once a month will be a worthwhile use of students' instructional time and school resources?
Claire:I support the idea of establishing car-free central zones because this will result in one important benefit for city residents-it will be better for their health. Instead of driving everywhere, people will be encouraged to walk or cycle more. It would be a great way to incorporate exercise into people's routines.Paul:It sounds like a good idea, but I'm skeptical. My mian concern is that many businesses located in the city centers, such as shops and restaurants, may suffer because th customers will no longer be able to reach those businesses by car. For some customers, if they cann't drive, they won't go at all.审题注意点:
这道题目重复了23年8月的原题。 也命中了【写作团-day18】的推送过思路和范文的原题。 这也是写作团今年第13次命中原题啦！
1."designated their downtown areas as being automobile-free which means that vehicles are not allowed to enter the city centers."
这里指的是，在市中心city centers 建立“禁车区”，其实也就是我们日常说的“步行街”。大家可以联系生活中的现实去分析。
eg. 成都同学都知道太古里-春熙路外围交通有多堵，开车去有多不方便。
2. 可行的思路：
好处：
---有助于减少环境污染。因为市中心长时间的交通堵塞，汽车排放的废气会导致空气污染严重。
---方便人们出行。因为车辆多，道路很堵塞，即使自己开车到了市中心，也需要很难找到停车位，对drivers也很不方便。对pedestrian行人来说，也不方便。以前因为有车辆来往，占用很多道路。其次，甚至有的车辆会停到人行道上。行人pedestrian：总是要等很久才能过马路。
---Claire: 有利于人们健康。因为人们只有靠走路，有利于健康。
👩🏻🏫：这算是一个有些“奇特”的角度。大家能想到细节就可以站队。
坏处：---影响市中心的商业。因为私家车无法直达，可能会一定程度上减少对市中心的人数。尤其是很多人是去购物。没人想提着大包小包，还要走一段很长一段才能到自己的车上。(Peopleare loaded withbags from stores,only to realizethat they have to walk a considerable distance to reach their parked car. This inconvenience might discourage people from shopping in those areas altogether.)
👩🏻🏫：这也是Paul的思路，比较好写，大家可以同意。
参考范文:
参考范文一：Istrongly support this policy of establishing car-free zones in more cities.This is because such a policy canbenefit both pedestrians and drivers. In busy downtown areas, drivers often find them either stuck in a traffic jam or struggling to finda vacant parking spot/place. Meanwhile, pedestrians face challenges from fast-moving traffic and long queues of cars thatblock crosswalks(人行道),making crossing the road impossible while waiting for the traffic lights..By implementing a car-free zone, drivers might be encouraged to utilize public transport or even walk, reducing congestion. Pedestrians can enjoy safer and more relaxedstrolls, enhancing the overall urban experience. This policy, while requiring proper planning, could lead to a more sustainable and pleasant urban environment.
参考思路二：
Itotally applaud this policy of establishing car-free zones in more cities.This is because this policy helps to improve the environment downtown. Without the large number of private cars stuck there, the toxic exhaust they emit will be reduced to a minimum....
第2套
整体难度：中等
综合写作回忆
暂缺
学术讨论写作
Dr. Achebe:
On the day of outdoor classes, students will be transported to local parks. There, teachers will help students explore nature and learn about the environment (for example, plants and animals), environmental problems (such as pollution), and ways of addressing these problems.Do you think that outdoor classes once a month will be a worthwhile use of students' instructional time and school resources?
Kelly:
We should avoid burdening teachers with additional responsibilities during instructional time. Teachers are already tasked with delivering quality education and managing classrooms effectively. Adding more duties, such as administrative tasks or non-teaching responsibilities, can divert their focus from teaching. Instead, we should prioritize supporting teachers in their primary role.
Andrew:
Hands-on learning outside the classroom can help students understand environmental problems in a tangible way and spark their interest to learn more. For example, measuring air or water quality in local areas impacted by pollution can vividly demonstrate environmental threats. Outdoor learning experiences make environmental issues real to students, motivating them to care about finding solutions.
审题注意点:
(1). 这道题重复了24年12月14日的考题。 也命中了写作团176期以前团里day3的原题。
(2). 题目的背景重点强调了：There, teachers will help students explore nature and learn about the environment (for example, plants and animals), environmental problems (such as pollution), and ways of addressing these problems.“老师会带着学生探索自然，学习环境的一些知识（比如，植物和动物), 了解环境问题(比如污染), 和之列环境问题的方法”.所以这个题目已经比较明确地给我们强调outdoor activities的主要内容了。所以大家现在分析的时候，建议大家注重写环境方面。
(3). 可行的分论点：
1. 其他二位同学的观点也比较常规, 好想，也比较容易展开。大家可以使用，扩写。
2. 好处：
① 激发学生的学习兴趣/学生会学得更好。不同于在教室里听老师的授课，学生可以真实都看到外在世界，发现一些环境问题：比如雾霾city smog/动物栖息地减少habitat loss。运用课堂上的知识解决一些问题(students can witness real-world applications of what they learn)。觉得课堂很有用，就会认真学习。
② 有利于学生开阔视野，学到更多的内容。（Exposure to nature and environmental issues can deepen their understanding and interest：native flora and fauna）
坏处：
①学习效率不高，老师管理起来很麻烦。比如小朋友被环境分心，不好好听老师的讲解。
②浪费学校的资源。学校一般都花了很多钱有自己的实验室，已经足够让学生去学习。（The cost-effectiveness of using in-house labs vs. field trips）
③给学校和老师带来额外的负担。学校要支付额外的费用，比如学生的车费，餐费，甚至还要安排更多的老师来管理学生。(Financial strain on school budgets.)
参考范文:
I concur with Andrew that it is beneficial for schools to integrate outdoor classes into students curriculum.
My conviction stems from the real-world understandingthat outdoor experiences provides to students.让相比于让学生整天坐在教室里，盯着黑板，听老师讲授一些枯燥的知识点,学生更喜欢在教室外自由的环境中学习知识。(students are justeithermindlessly scribbling down complex mathematical equations or staring at the blackboard without reallyputting thoughts in it, an outdoor environment offers a more interactive and engaging learning experience).比如，学生们很容易走神当老师滔滔不绝地讲环境保护有多重要，但是当学生们在公园里亲眼看到因为整个城市因为工厂大量燃烧煤炭导致酸雨频发,当地河流中的鱼类都大量死亡后(However, witnessing firsthand the detrimental effects of environment neglect, such as the local fish populations being threaten with extinction due tothe frequent acid rain caused by the burning of fossil fuels)，他们就会更投入地学习，专研解决措施(students are more likely to become actively involved in their learning and seek solutions to these pressing issues).In conclusion...
第3套
综合写作回忆
欢迎同学们在下方留言处补充
学术讨论写作
教授：This week, we'll be discussing the future of education. Let's focus now on the following viewpoint: it is no longer useful to spend many years pursuing a traditional, specialized university degree in a single field, such as communications or economics. Instead, it makes more sense for most people to complete several shorter certification programs and earn certificates in, for example, project management, computer programming, graphic design, and so on.
Do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint? Why?ClaireI strongly support this approach because it aligns with the changing preferences of many individuals in the modern world who often wish to switch majors or career paths. Embracing certification programs allows people to explore and pursue the fields they are passionate about without the commitment of lengthy degree programs.
PaulUniversity education is a superior choice due to its comprehensive and specialized nature. While certification programs offer quick training, universities provide a more in-depth understanding of a subject. They encourage critical thinking, research skills, and a broader knowledge base. University degrees often lead to higher earning potential and career opportunities.
审题注意点:
(1). 这道题重复了今年3月1日下午场的原题。这道题的考题分析老师在公众号里第一时间推送过，看过的老师公众号的同学应该幸运了。
题目翻译：
教授：本周，我们将讨论教育的未来。现在让我们关注以下观点：在单一领域（如传播学或经济学）上花费多年时间追求传统的、专业的大学学位已经不再有用。相反，对于大多数人来说，完成几个较短的认证项目severalshortercertificationprograms并获得证书（例如，项目管理、计算机编程、平面设计等）更有意义。你同意还是不同意这个观点？为什么？
这道题关于项目式学习还是长期专业学习。但是切入点很多，题目也对“学历证书项目”提供了详细的解释。整个难度系数中等。
(1).比较shorter的，拿证书式的certification program学习方式，比如厨师证...：
好处：
1. 时间比较短。方便人们换专业，选择到适合自己的专业= Claire. 尤其是很多工作人士，并没有那么多时间专门学习。
(比如，英国，香港的研究生其实也采用的这种项目制学习，只有一年。所以去学习的很多都是工作人士。)
2. 学费少。时间段，学费也相对低一些，减轻学生的经济负担。
(2).传统很详细很展开去学习一个学位degree的方式.：
好处：
1. 时间长。学习能够深入系统地学习。否则只能学习一些最基本的内容。比如，可以有更多的学习体验。而如果时间短，大部分只能在教室里听老师授课，为了拿证书填鸭式学习cram for examinations.
2. 时间长，学习压力也会小一些。如果时间段，学习压力会很大。（比如，老师在港中文读研的时候，一学年时间虽然段，但其实学习内容跟学习压力跟美国两年制学习是一样的。异常忙碌。 一学期的感觉是“开始了吗？已经结束了”）
3. 时间长，能够结识到更多的志同道合的朋友，扩展朋友圈。
参考提纲：
I concur with Andrew's the view that shorter, certification-based learning programsare superior totraditional degree programs. The primary reason is that shorter programs bettersuit the needsof today's professionals, especially given the rapid pace of technological change.
(站队+总观点+分论点)
One major advantage of shorter programs is their flexibility and accessibility.Many people in today's fast-paced society find that their skills quickly become outdated, requiring frequent updates.Take, for instance, the administrative workforce,where many secretaries fear that their roles may be overtaken by advanced Artificial Intelligence technologies that can efficiently manage schedules and draft contracts.In situations like these, going back to college for a full-time degree is often impracticalespecially for those juggling other commitmentssuch as childcare or mortgage payments.
(展开：原因+举例+对比)
Shorter programs offer a practical solution to this dilemma.Even the busiest working mother can find time overa couple of months to attend night classes or afford a brief period without income. These short courses often culminate in a certification exam that can be completed in a weekend,something unthinkable in a traditional educational setting that usually demands at least a year of full-time study.
(展开：对比.)
In conclusion,while traditional degree programs have their merits, shorter, more flexible learning options are better suited to meet the diverse needs of modern society.They offer a practical and efficient route for skill upgrading, making them a sensible choice for today's busy professionals.
【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信：mollywei007】
