暑期辩题投票开启!NHSDLC线上全国邀请赛报名开放!冠军赛场地揭晓!

暑意渐浓,没错,我们又将迎来NHSDLC年度大事件——年度冠军赛 &线上全国邀请赛三大亮点,一文官宣!

PF 辩题投票正式开启——

你的选择,决定今夏辩题

✅ 线上全国邀请赛报名开放——

足不出户,与全国辩手一较高下

✅ 年度冠军赛举办场地揭晓——

线下巅峰对决,等你见证

让我们用热情

与这个夏天碰撞出最绚烂的火花!

上个月,我们向广大迪贝er们

征集了暑期辩题领域

大家在评论区展开了激烈的讨论

今日,暑期辩题投票正式开启!

今年的候选辩题丰富多样:

从老生常谈的英国重返欧盟的政治选择

到经济制裁的外交博弈

还有能源债务、贸易战略等话题

定有你中意的辩题!

在此衷心感谢

所有参与辩题提名的同学、教练和裁判们

(领域征集互动获奖名单将在文中公布)

相信本次冠军赛的辩题能够带领大家

开启一段酣畅淋漓的思辨之旅!

暑期辩题投票开启!线上全国邀请赛报名开放!冠军赛场地揭晓!

下面来具体看看本次的候选辩题吧~

#1、政治

Politics

Resolved: The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland should rejoin the European Union.

英国应该重新加入欧盟。

The question of whether the UK should rejoin the European Union remains controversial. Is Brexit a mistake? Years after Brexit, people start to look back and evaluate that decision.

Pro teams will argue that rejoining will improve the economy and trade, align regulations, and increase international influence.

Con teams will counter that the status quo respects the outcome of democratic vote, maintains sovereignty and national independence, and potentially benefits the economy in the long term.

Who is right?

#2、经济

Economics

Resolved: Economic sanctions are more harmful than beneficial.

经济制裁弊大于利。

Economic sanctions are a common diplomatic tool but have many critics.

Pro teams will focus on the harm done to civilian populations and their failure to solve intended problems.

On the other side, Con teams will argue that military intervention is the likely alternative and worse, and that sanctions can be effectively targeted to minimize harm.

Teams will have to weigh the humanitarian harms of sanctions against foreign policy gains.

#3、经济&环境

Economics&Environment

Resolved:International financial institutions should cancel all outstanding public debt from fossil fuel projects in low- and middle-income countries (LIMC).

国际金融机构应取消中低收入国家(LIMC)化石燃料项目的所有未偿公共债务。

The resolution advocating for the cancellation of outstanding public debt from fossil fuel projects in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) is centered around the impacts of climate change and the financial burdens placed on these nations.

Pro teams will argue that many fossil fuel debts are illegitimate, stemming from projects that failed to deliver promised economic benefits and exacerbated environmental degradation and social injustices.

Con teams will likely argue that debt cancellation creates a moral hazard and the potential negative implications for future lending practices and economic growth.

How to balance between mitigating climate change and maintaining economic growth, especially in regard with poverty reduction in poorer countries?

#4、政治

Politics

Resolved:The abolition of USAID brings net benefits to the U.S. national interest.

废除美国国际开发署(USAID)为美国国家利益带来净收益。

Recent cuts to the budget of the US Agency for International Development sparked a wider debate about the need for, and appropriate use of, development assistance.

The public sees that the development assistance has been used as cover for regime change and wastes money on projects that don't benefit the US.

However, there still might be specific USAID programs that have been effective, especially ones related to education, food insecurity, health, landmines and others.

Debates will balance the economic and political benefits with the diplomatic gains from development assistance.

#5、经济

Economics

Resolved:Latin American countries should prioritize intraregional trade over international trade.

拉丁美洲国家应优先发展区域内贸易,而非国际贸易。

Regional versus international trade is a timely subject for debate.

Proponents argue that intraregional trade improves local industries and regional unity, while it reduces dependence on and vulnerability to global markets. People also feel that strengthening regional ties and improving collaboration could also benefit regional security.

Opponents instead defend the benefits of international trade, including access to international markets and the improved relations with trading partners.

Debates will frequently come down to which team has the best approach to promoting trade.

投票方式

大家可以通过扫描下方二维码进行投票,也可以在NHSDLC官方公众号的菜单栏“联赛指南-辩题投票”内找到投票通道。一人限投一次,无需重复投票哦~

暑期辩题投票开启!线上全国邀请赛报名开放!冠军赛场地揭晓!暑期辩题投票开启!线上全国邀请赛报名开放!冠军赛场地揭晓!

2025 NHSDLC线上全国邀请赛报名开启!

时间:8月16日 - 8月18日

地点:Online

组别:

公共论坛式辩论

初中组 (Middle School Division)

公开组 (Open Division)

公共演讲

■ 原创演讲

小学组 (Elementary School Division)

初中组 (Middle School Division)

高中组 (High School Division)

■ 经典演说

小学组 (Elementary School Division)

青少年世界学校辩论

7-13周岁青少年组

林肯道格拉斯辩论

面向12年级及以下学生开放

报名资格 :

请选手根据就读年级准确报名对应组别,初中组仅对9年级及以下选手开放报名,公开组/高中组对12年级或以下选手开放报名,青少年世界学校辩论针对7-13周岁选手开放。

2025 NHSDLC 年度冠军赛报名正在进行中!

时间:8月2日 - 8月7日(具体赛程待公布)

地点:上海

组别:

公共论坛式辩论

初中组 (Middle School Division)

公开组 (Open Division)

公共演讲

■ 原创演讲

小学组 (Elementary School Division)

初中组 (Middle School Division)

高中组 (High School Division)

■ 经典演说

小学组 (Elementary School Division)

青少年世界学校辩论

7-13周岁青少年组

英国议会制辩论

中学组(School Division)

公开组(Open Division)

报名资格:

选手需满足以下至少一项条件,方可报名参赛:

1. 在地区赛或线上联赛中晋级淘汰赛的选手;

2. 参加2023/2024年度冠军赛的选手;

3. 参加训练营的选手;

4. 优秀选手可独立申请报名 (需由组委会审核决定);

5. BP赛事的选手仅进行年龄要求审核。

注意事项:

1. 组别设置中:

小学组面向6年级及以下的所有学生;

初中组面向9年级及以下的所有学生;

PS高中组、PF公开组及BP中学组面向12年级及以下的所有学生;

青少年世界学校辩论面向7-13周岁的所有学生。

2. NHSDLC年度冠军赛为全国性赛事,参赛辩手的学校类型和国籍将不会对报名参赛的组别产生影响。

场地公布:

上海浦东新区民办惠立学校

具体地址:

上海市浦东新区林耀路235号

上海浦东新区民办惠立学校(后简称为:上海惠立)位于上海市浦东新区前滩国际商务区,致力于融汇东西,汲取中英教育精粹,创造以学生为主导的、沉浸式双语双文化学习体验, 并提供优质的长期教育规划。

上海惠立专注于 「鱼和熊掌兼得」的长期主义教育。在惠立,学生的成功不仅体现在短期的成绩上,而是通过关注多维能力的提升,帮助学生们在长远的未来获得更大的、可持续的成就。

2025NHSDLC暑期项目时间线

暑期辩题投票开启!线上全国邀请赛报名开放!冠军赛场地揭晓!暑期辩题投票开启!线上全国邀请赛报名开放!冠军赛场地揭晓!

【竞赛报名/项目咨询+微信:mollywei007】

上一篇

从UKJMC到UKJMO一场思维实力的晋级战

下一篇

为什么建议所有小学生都来挑战袋鼠数学竞赛?附暑期培训班

你也可能喜欢

  • 暂无相关文章!

评论已经被关闭。

插入图片
返回顶部